Top Buzzes

Why AI Isn’t Physics (And Why That Matters)

You’ve probably heard the phrase “AI is physics” floating around lately. Maybe from a tech CEO, a LinkedIn post, or even a Nobel Prize-related headline. It sounds deep, almost poetic—like we’ve uncovered some cosmic connection between artificial intelligence and the laws of the universe. But here’s the thing: it’s not true. And the distinction matters.

I’ve spent years working with AI—building models, training systems, and digging into the math behind it all. And while I’ll admit that machine learning sometimes borrows tools from physics (like diffusion models or energy-based approaches), that doesn’t make AI physics. Borrowing a wrench from someone’s toolbox doesn’t turn you into a mechanic.

The Math Isn’t the Mystery

AI runs on algorithms, not atoms. There are no particles bouncing around in a neural network, no gravity dictating how data flows. The core of AI is computation: linear algebra, calculus, probability, and optimization. You don’t need to understand quantum mechanics to train a model—you need to understand math and code.

The algorithms themselves don’t care where they run. Silicon chips, water-based computers, or even a hypothetical biological substrate—the math stays the same. The implementation changes, but the underlying logic doesn’t. That’s the beauty of abstraction.

Why the Confusion?

Physics has a certain allure. It deals with fundamental truths, the fabric of reality. So when people say “AI is physics,” it sounds profound. But it’s misleading. AI isn’t governed by universal laws; it’s shaped by human choices—dataset selection, architecture design, and even societal biases. Calling it “physics” glosses over the messy, human side of the field.

Sure, physics might help us push the limits of hardware or understand the thermodynamics of computation. But that’s a far cry from saying AI itself is physics.

Let’s Keep the Mystique in Check

AI is incredible, but it’s not magic. It’s not some force of nature waiting to be unlocked. It’s a tool, built by people, for people. And the more we demystify it, the better we can shape its future—without the hype.

So next time someone tells you “AI is physics,” ask them: “Where’s the gravity in my neural net?”